Mid-Term Evaluation Report on Health Care Service for Rohingya and host community
Evaluating a Health Project for Rohingya Refugees: A Multi-Phase Approach
This report describes the evaluation process for a health project supporting Rohingya refugees in Bangladesh. The evaluation was conducted in three phases:
Phase 1: Inception (August 2020)
Establishing roles and expectations:
The evaluation team and GUSS staff aligned their understanding of the evaluation’s purpose and roles, based on the Terms of Reference.
Refining the focus:
The evaluation focus was sharpened based on initial discussions and planning.
Data planning:
The team planned for data collection during the field phase.
Activities:
This phase included phone and email communication, a kick-off meeting at GUSS headquarters, and an inception report.
Phase 2: Data Collection (September 2020)
Document analysis:
Review of monitoring reports and other project documents.
Field visit:
Data collection in Rohingya refugee camp 1(E), Kutupalang, Ukhia, and Cox’s Bazar District from September 5th to 8th, 2020.
Joint data collection:
Collaboration with GUSS employees during the field visit.
Additional interviews:
Conducting interviews with relevant stakeholders like local authorities, WHO, and other aid organizations.
Phase 3: Analysis and Reporting (September 2020)
Data triangulation:
Comparing and cross-checking data from various sources and methods to ensure accuracy and reliability.
Draft report discussion:
Discussion of draft report findings with GUSS headquarters.
Final report submission:
Submission of the final evaluation report on August 30th, 2020.
Key Evaluation Considerations:
Long-term prospects for refugees:
The evaluation recognized the growing importance of long-term solutions as the refugee crisis extended beyond three years.
Bangladesh government’s stance:
The evaluation acknowledged the government’s desire to integrate refugee healthcare into its existing system, reducing dependence on parallel structures.
Protection framework principles:
The evaluation adhered to the principles outlined in the Joint Response Plan 2020, emphasizing community-led approaches, accountability, and information access.
Host community relations:
Despite rising tensions, the evaluation team maintained objectivity and collected data both independently and in collaboration with GUSS personnel.
Medical expertise:
The evaluation team consulted with doctors in other health institutions for additional insights and analysis.